Department Of Justice Knowingly and Falsely Imprisoned More Than 60 Black Men In NC

Department Of Justice Knowingly and Falsely Imprisoned More Than 60 Black Men In NC

We’ve heard of some tough laws but NC definitely takes the cake in downright disregard for those who have been found innocent of crimes by which they were false convicted. Read the report below and see for yourself what kind of justice system we have in America.

Terrell McCullum did not commit a federal crime by carrying a shotgun and a rifle out of his ex-girlfriend’s house.

But he is serving a federal prison sentence for it. And the fact that everyone — including the U.S. Justice Department— agrees that he is legally innocent might not be enough to set him free.

A USA TODAY investigation, based on court records and interviews with government officials and attorneys, found more than 60 men who went to prison for violating federal gun possession laws, even though courts have since determined that it was not a federal crime for them to have a gun.

Many of them don’t even know they’re innocent.

The legal issues underlying their situation are complicated, and are unique to North Carolina. But the bottom line is that each of them went to prison for breaking a law that makes it a federal crime for convicted felons to possess a gun. The problem is that none of them had criminal records serious enough to make them felons under federal law.

Still, the Justice Department has not attempted to identify the men, has made no effort to notify them, and, in a few cases in which the men have come forward on their own, has argued in court that they should not be released.

If you read the following statement, you just might fall out from the blatant disregard for humankind at best.

Justice Department officials said it is not their job to notify prisoners that they might be incarcerated for something that they now concede is not a crime. And although they have agreed in court filings that the men are innocent, they said they must still comply with federal laws that put strict limits on when and how people can challenge their convictions in court.

Says U.S. Attorney Anne Tompkins:

“We can’t be outcome driven,” said Anne Tompkins, the U.S. attorney in Charlotte. “We’ve got to make sure we follow the law, and people should want us to do that.” She said her office is “looking diligently for ways, within the confines of the law, to recommend relief for defendants who are legally innocent.”

These cases are largely unknown outside the courthouses here, but they have raised difficult questions about what, if anything, the government owes to innocent people locked in prisons.

“It’s been tough,” said Ripley Rand, the U.S. attorney in Greensboro, N.C. “We’ve spent a lot of time talking about issues of fundamental fairness, and what is justice.”

 

Read more of the story HERE

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

We welcome your comments below. PLEASE READ BEFORE REPLYING: We will not tolerate profanity, offensive language, personal attacks or threats on this blog. Thank you for your cooperation and for visiting AT2W.